The Anarchy: Empress Matilda’s claim to the English throne

Empress Matilda, daughter of King Henry I of England, had a legitimate claim to the English throne after her father’s death in 1135. However, her path to securing that claim was fraught with difficulty and controversy. Born in 1102, Matilda was Henry’s only legitimate surviving child following the death of her brother, William Adelin, in the White Ship disaster of 1120.

This tragedy left Henry I without a male heir, forcing him to focus on securing Matilda’s succession. To fortify her position, Henry required his barons to swear allegiance to her as his successor, which was an unprecedented move for a woman in the male-dominated world of medieval politics.

The Anarchy was one of the most destructive periods in medieval English history. Sparked by a disputed succession following the death of Henry I, the civil war between Stephen of Blois and Empress Matilda plunged England into chaos for over a decade. Image (L-R): Empress Matilda, King Stephen of England

Despite Henry’s efforts, Matilda’s accession was contested after his death. The English throne was claimed by her cousin Stephen of Blois, who quickly moved to secure power and was crowned king, despite the oaths sworn to Matilda. Stephen’s swift actions were supported by key figures like his brother Henry of Blois, the influential Bishop of Winchester, and his move to the throne sparked a protracted and violent civil war known as “The Anarchy.”

A 14th-century illustration depicts Henry I and the 1120 sinking of the White Ship off Barfleur, Normandy. British Library.

Matilda’s Marriage and Political Position

Matilda’s marriage to Geoffrey of Anjou was critical in shaping her position in European politics. Geoffrey was a powerful figure in France, and their union was arranged by Henry I to secure an alliance between England and the Angevin territories. Although this marriage strengthened Matilda’s claim to the throne by tying her to a powerful French noble house, it also caused tension among the English nobility, many of whom were wary of increased French influence.

Matilda’s son, Henry FitzEmpress (later Henry II), was another crucial factor in her bid for the throne. As Matilda’s claim to the crown faltered in the face of Stephen’s seizure of power, she focused on ensuring her son’s future as king, using her husband’s resources to support her fight against Stephen.

Stephen of Blois (1092/96–1154) was King of England from 1135 until his death in 1154. His reign was defined by a civil war known as The Anarchy, fought against his cousin, Empress Matilda. Stephen was also Count of Boulogne (1125–1147) and Duke of Normandy (1135–1144). He was succeeded by Matilda’s son, Henry II, the first Angevin king. Image: Great Seal of King Stephen of England

The Civil War: “The Anarchy”

The conflict between Matilda and Stephen was deeply disruptive to the kingdom. The period known as “The Anarchy” was marked by shifting allegiances, widespread devastation, and a breakdown of law and order. Matilda’s first attempt to assert her claim to the throne came in 1139 when she, supported by her half-brother Robert of Gloucester, landed in England to challenge Stephen’s reign. However, the conflict proved difficult, and while Matilda controlled much of the southwest and parts of the Thames Valley, Stephen retained control of other critical areas, including London and the southeast.

A key turning point in the civil war came in 1141 at the Battle of Lincoln, where Stephen was captured by Matilda’s forces. For a moment, it appeared that Matilda’s claim might prevail. Matilda moved to London, preparing to be crowned queen. However, hostile crowds and political opposition forced her to retreat, and the momentum shifted once again. Later that year, Robert of Gloucester was captured by Stephen’s forces, leading to a prisoner exchange that restored Stephen to power and allowed Matilda to continue her resistance.

The conflict between Empress Matilda and Stephen of Blois saw the collapse of centralized authority, the rise of powerful regional barons, and widespread devastation. Image: Near-contemporary illustration of the Battle of Lincoln shows Stephen (fourth from right) listening to Baldwin of Clare’s speech.

Challenges to Matilda’s Claim

Matilda faced several challenges in asserting her claim to the throne. First, there was the issue of gender. In the 12th century, the idea of a reigning queen was unprecedented, and many nobles were reluctant to accept a female ruler, fearing it would undermine the traditional structures of power and governance. Furthermore, Matilda’s marriage to Geoffrey of Anjou created friction with the Anglo-Norman barons, who were wary of Angevin influence in English affairs. Geoffrey himself was not popular in England, and his efforts to expand Angevin control in Normandy made him a divisive figure.

Another challenge was Matilda’s personal style of rule. Contemporary chroniclers often described her as imperious and haughty, traits that did not endear her to the English nobility. Her difficulties in maintaining the loyalty of key figures, such as the Londoners who turned against her when she attempted to enter the city in 1141, underscore the personal and political obstacles she faced.

Despite these setbacks, Matilda remained a persistent figure in the civil war. Her military efforts were bolstered by her half-brother Robert of Gloucester, who was her most loyal and effective supporter. The war was characterized by a series of sieges, raids, and skirmishes, with neither side able to gain a decisive advantage.

Matilda’s Retreat and Henry FitzEmpress

By 1148, after years of indecisive warfare, Matilda withdrew from active campaigning and returned to Normandy, where she continued to support her son Henry’s ambitions. Henry FitzEmpress was a charismatic and determined young man, and by the early 1150s, he began to make his own bid for power. In 1153, Henry re-invaded England, capitalizing on growing dissatisfaction with Stephen’s reign. The war between the two factions had worn down both sides, and neither Stephen’s forces nor Henry’s were keen for a pitched battle.

At the siege of Wallingford in 1153, a truce was brokered between Stephen and Henry, with the Church playing a significant role in facilitating the negotiations. The death of Stephen’s son Eustace later that year removed Stephen’s immediate heir, creating an opportunity for a peaceful resolution. The Treaty of Wallingford, agreed upon later that year, allowed Stephen to remain king for the rest of his life but recognized Henry as his successor.

When Stephen died in 1154, Henry FitzEmpress was crowned Henry II, marking the end of the civil war and the beginning of the Angevin dynasty. Matilda’s dream of securing the English throne for her family was realized, albeit indirectly, through her son.

Although the war ended with the Treaty of Wallingford and the succession of Henry II, its consequences were felt for generations, shaping the future of the English monarchy and its governance. Image: Ruins of Wallingford Castle, where a truce was agreed.

Did you know…?

Victorian historians coined the term “The Anarchy” to describe the period, though modern scholars question the accuracy of the description.

Legacy of Matilda’s Claim

Matilda’s legacy as a claimant to the English throne is complex. Although she never ruled as queen in her own right, her efforts to secure the crown laid the groundwork for her son Henry II’s reign. The civil war, however, had left England politically fragmented and economically weakened. Henry II would spend much of his reign restoring royal authority and rebuilding the kingdom’s legal and administrative structures, which had been severely damaged during The Anarchy.

Matilda’s claim also challenged traditional views of gender and royal succession. Although she was ultimately unsuccessful in becoming England’s reigning monarch, her role in the civil war demonstrated that a woman could be a formidable political and military leader, capable of inspiring loyalty and commanding armies. In later centuries, female rulers such as Elizabeth I would cite Matilda’s example as a precedent for their own authority.

Additionally, the civil war between Matilda and Stephen set an important precedent for future disputes over the English crown. The conflict revealed the dangers of unclear succession, underscoring the need for stability and legitimacy in royal claims. This lesson would resonate throughout English history, influencing the way subsequent monarchs approached succession and governance.

Henry II’s reign marked the beginning of a new era, one in which royal power would be restored, but The Anarchy remained a dark chapter in England’s medieval history. Image: Contemporary miniature of Henry II of England from the Topographia Hibernica, c. 1186–1188

Conclusion

Empress Matilda’s claim to the English throne was a pivotal event in medieval English history. Her determined struggle to assert her rights following the death of her father, Henry I, led to a bitter and protracted civil war that reshaped the political landscape of England.

Although Matilda never succeeded in being crowned queen, her efforts paved the way for her son, Henry II, to become one of England’s most powerful and influential monarchs.

Questions and Answers

The Anarchy was a civil war in England and Normandy between 1138 and 1153, sparked by a succession crisis following the death of King Henry I’s only legitimate son, William Adelin, in 1120. Image: Henry I of England

Why did the civil war break out after Henry I’s death?

Henry I wanted his daughter, Empress Matilda, to succeed him, but his nephew, Stephen of Blois, seized the throne upon Henry’s death in 1135, triggering a war for the crown.

Image: 14th century depiction of King Stephen with a hunting bird

Who were the key figures in the conflict?

Key figures included Stephen of Blois, Empress Matilda, her half-brother Robert of Gloucester, and her son Henry FitzEmpress (later Henry II).

What was the Battle of Lincoln (1141)?

The Battle of Lincoln was a pivotal clash where Stephen was captured, allowing Matilda’s forces to gain the upper hand temporarily.

Why did Matilda fail to secure the throne after capturing Stephen?

Matilda was forced to retreat from London due to hostile crowds and later exchanged Stephen for her half-brother, Robert of Gloucester, who had been captured by Stephen’s forces.

How did the war come to a resolution?

In 1153, Henry FitzEmpress re-invaded England, and a truce brokered by the Church led to the Treaty of Wallingford, which allowed Stephen to remain king but named Henry as his heir.

What was the Treaty of Wallingford?

The Treaty of Wallingford, also known as the Treaty of Winchester, ended the civil war by confirming Stephen as king for life and recognizing Henry as his successor.

How did The Anarchy affect England?

The Anarchy led to widespread lawlessness, with barons gaining significant power over their territories, weakening central authority. It left the country politically fragmented and devastated by conflict.

What were the long-term consequences of The Anarchy?

The disorder during The Anarchy made clear the need for stable governance and legal reforms, leading Henry II to introduce significant changes, such as the development of common law.

Henry II was the first Plantagenet king of England. Image: Contemporary depiction of Henry II of England from the Gospels of Henry the Lion, c. 1175–1188

How did The Anarchy influence royal succession disputes?

The Anarchy challenged traditional concepts of royal succession and set the stage for future conflicts over the English crown, reinforcing the importance of clear lines of succession.

What was the famous quote from chroniclers about The Anarchy?

One chronicler remarked that “Christ and his saints were asleep” during The Anarchy, reflecting the severe chaos and lawlessness that gripped the country during the conflict.

When did The Anarchy end, and who became king afterward?

The Anarchy ended with Stephen’s death in 1154, and Henry FitzEmpress was crowned Henry II, beginning the Plantagenet and Angevin dynasties in England.

 

FACT CHECK: At worldhistoryedu.com, we strive for utmost accuracy and objectivity. But if you come across something that doesn’t look right, don’t hesitate to leave a comment below.