The Mithridatic Wars (88–63 BCE) were three critical conflicts fought between the Roman Republic and the Kingdom of Pontus, led by King Mithridates VI. These wars represented a pivotal moment in the expansion of Roman hegemony in the Eastern Mediterranean and Asia Minor. The conflicts culminated in Rome’s annexation of Pontus and Syria, and the establishment of client states under Roman influence. Prominent Roman generals, including Lucius Cornelius Sulla, Lucius Licinius Lucullus, and Gnaeus Pompey Magnus, played key roles in bringing the wars to an end.

READ MORE: Top 10 Ancient Roman Generals and their Notable Accomplishments

Etymology and Terminology

The term “Mithridatic War” derives from bellum Mithridaticum, used in official Roman decrees to refer to the Senate’s 88 BCE declaration of war against Mithridates VI. Initially considered a single, continuous conflict, historians later divided the war into three distinct phases due to the temporal and geographic separations in its events. This division is modern, as the original Senate mandate technically remained in force until Mithridates’ death in 63 BCE.

Prelude to the Wars

Mithridates VI sought to expand his dominion by incorporating neighboring territories such as Cappadocia and Bithynia through political manipulation and military action. He installed puppet rulers in these kingdoms, including his nephew Ariarathes IX in Cappadocia. These actions alarmed Rome, which supported rival claimants, such as Nicomedes IV of Bithynia and Ariobarzanes I of Cappadocia. Roman intervention intensified as disputes over these territories escalated, culminating in the First Mithridatic War.

The Aquilian Legation

In 90 BCE, the Roman Senate dispatched a diplomatic mission, the Aquilian Legation, led by Manius Aquillius, to restore Nicomedes IV and Ariobarzanes I to their thrones. Mithridates initially avoided conflict and allowed these changes without resistance. However, tensions rose when Aquillius urged these newly restored kings to invade Pontic territories to repay debts incurred through Roman political bribery.

Hostilities Begin

Nicomedes IV launched raids into Pontus in 89 BCE, provoking Mithridates to retaliate. Mithridates swiftly occupied Cappadocia, deposing Ariobarzanes I, and later invaded Bithynia, defeating Nicomedes IV. Rome’s failure to mediate these hostilities effectively triggered open war.

Map depicting the Kingdom of Pontus.

First Mithridatic War (89–85 BCE)

Mithridates’ early campaigns saw rapid success. By 88 BCE, he controlled vast swathes of Anatolia, including Cappadocia, Bithynia, and the Roman province of Asia. He orchestrated the infamous “Asiatic Vespers,” a coordinated massacre of 80,000–150,000 Roman citizens and allies in these territories, aiming to eliminate Roman influence entirely.

Roman forces, led by Sulla, landed in Epirus in 87 BCE. Sulla marched into Greece, besieging Athens, which had allied with Mithridates. After a protracted siege, Athens fell in 86 BCE, and Mithridates’ general Archelaus was defeated at the battles of Chaeronea and Orchomenus in 86–85 BCE.

The war ended with the Treaty of Dardanos in 85 BCE. Mithridates retained his kingdom but had to cede conquered territories and withdraw from Roman-dominated regions. Sulla returned to Rome to address internal political conflicts, leaving Asia Minor in a precarious peace.

A brief history of Ancient Athens and how it became the birthplace of Western Civilization

Second Mithridatic War (83–81 BCE)

Despite the Treaty of Dardanos, tensions reignited when Lucius Licinius Murena, a Roman commander, attacked Pontic territory in 83 BCE, suspecting Mithridates of preparing for another invasion. Mithridates’ protests to the Roman Senate led to an order for Murena’s withdrawal, but Murena ignored it, continuing his incursions.

Mithridates decisively defeated Murena’s forces at the Halys River in 82 BCE. However, further escalation was avoided when Sulla sent envoys to enforce the Senate’s directive to end hostilities. Peace was restored by 81 BCE, but mistrust between Rome and Pontus persisted.

Map showing the regions and activities during the Mithridatic Wars.

Third Mithridatic War (74–63 BCE)

The death of Nicomedes IV in 74 BCE, who bequeathed Bithynia to Rome, prompted Mithridates to invade the kingdom. Rome responded by deploying Lucius Licinius Lucullus and Marcus Aurelius Cotta to counter Mithridates’ aggression.

Lucullus achieved significant victories, including the siege of Cyzicus (73 BCE) and the battles of Cabira (72 BCE) and Tigranocerta (69 BCE). However, his campaigns were marred by logistical challenges and diminishing troop morale. Mithridates fled to Armenia, seeking refuge with his son-in-law, Tigranes II.

In 66 BCE, Gnaeus Pompey Magnus assumed command. He decisively defeated Mithridates at the Battle of Lycus in 66 BCE. Mithridates fled to the Bosporan Kingdom, where he attempted to organize a final resistance. His plans collapsed when his son, Pharnaces II, rebelled against him. Cornered and betrayed, Mithridates committed suicide in 63 BCE.

Aftermath and Impact

The Third Mithridatic War marked the end of Mithridates’ reign and the incorporation of Pontus and Syria as Roman provinces. Armenia and the Bosporan Kingdom became Roman client states. The wars significantly expanded Roman influence in the Eastern Mediterranean, solidifying its dominance in Asia Minor.

Mithridates VI, despite his ultimate defeat, remains one of antiquity’s most resilient and enigmatic adversaries of Rome.

The wars highlighted the growing power of individual Roman generals, such as Sulla and Pompey, at the expense of senatorial authority. Sulla’s campaigns in the East bolstered his political position, enabling him to seize power in Rome. Similarly, Pompey’s successes earned him immense prestige and political capital.

The wars devastated much of Asia Minor, disrupting local economies and societies. However, they also facilitated the spread of Roman administration, culture, and infrastructure throughout the region.

Historical Sources

Several ancient authors provide accounts of the Mithridatic Wars:

• Appian: His Mithridatic Wars offers the most comprehensive narrative of the conflicts.
• Plutarch: Biographies of Sulla, Lucullus, and Pompey provide detailed insights into the key Roman commanders.
• Livy: Although his full work is lost, surviving summaries (Periochae) outline key events.
• Diodorus Siculus and Velleius Paterculus: Offer briefer accounts that contextualize the wars within broader Roman history.

Greatest Roman Historians and their Major Works