The Papyrus Lansing: “If you’re wise, choose to become a scribe!”

During the reign of Senusret III, a prominent Pharaoh of Egypt’s 12th Dynasty, the kingdom experienced a period of relative political stability, with many of the internal struggles that had plagued earlier dynasties largely resolved. With internal matters under control, Senusret III was able to focus his efforts on campaigns in Nubia, strengthening Egypt’s southern border, and improving the nation’s infrastructure by digging canals. This period of increased governmental activity required a larger administrative workforce, particularly scribes, to manage Egypt’s expanding bureaucracy. As the demand for scribes grew, texts like the Papyrus Lansing played a crucial role in encouraging young Egyptians to pursue careers as scribes.

The Papyrus Lansing, named after its former curator at the British Museum, is not only an instructional document aimed at a young apprentice named Wenemdiamun but also a piece of propaganda meant to elevate the scribal profession. It circulated widely and helped create a public interest in becoming a scribe, a prestigious and vital profession in ancient Egypt’s governmental structure. Young scribes-in-training often copied the Papyrus Lansing as part of their education, reinforcing both their skills and the importance of literacy in Egyptian society. Discovered in Thebes and acquired by the British Museum in 1886, the text remains one of the most significant pieces of Egyptian wisdom literature.

 

Middle Kingdom pharaohs

The Papyrus Lansing was written by royal scribe Nebmare-nakht around the Senusret III’s reign (18th century B.C.). The text promotes the advantages of becoming a scribe while criticizing physical labor jobs like farming and soldiering. Image: Statue of Senusret III.

Structure of the Papyrus Lansing

The Papyrus Lansing is divided into five key sections, each presenting the case for becoming a scribe by contrasting the scribe’s life with that of other, more labor-intensive occupations.

Through these divisions, the text makes an emotional and practical appeal to young Wenemdiamun, the apprentice, urging him to fully commit to his scribal studies.

Praise of the Scribe’s Profession

The first section of the Papyrus Lansing introduces the author, Nebmare-nakht, who is identified as a royal scribe and chief overseer of Amun-Ra’s sacred cattle. In this section, Nebmare-nakht extols the virtues of becoming a scribe, presenting it as a path to great personal advancement. He emphasizes that the profession of a scribe offers more rewards than any other career and advises Wenemdiamun to shun all other pursuits in favor of mastering writing.

According to Nebmare-nakht, the joy that comes from writing surpasses even basic human necessities like bread and beer, which were highly valued in Egyptian society. This comparison highlights the intellectual and spiritual satisfaction that literacy and knowledge can provide, positioning scribes as essential members of society.

READ MORE: List of Ancient Egyptian Gods and Goddesses

Advice to the Unwilling Pupil

The second section addresses Wenemdiamun’s reluctance and slowness in pursuing his scribal studies. Nebmare-nakht chastises his apprentice, lamenting that even physical punishment (whipping) has failed to motivate him. Despite this frustration, Nebmare-nakht expresses hope for Wenemdiamun’s potential, stating that he would make an excellent scribe if only he committed to the task at hand.

This section reflects the challenges of teaching and mentoring young scribes, many of whom faced years of rigorous training before achieving mastery. Nebmare-nakht compares the joy of writing to the joy of a mother with her newborn, signaling the deep personal fulfillment that comes from excelling in the scribal profession.

All Occupations Are Bad Except That of the Scribe

In the third section, Nebmare-nakht makes a case for the superiority of the scribe’s profession by comparing it to other occupations, all of which he describes as physically demanding and undesirable. He paints a vivid picture of the hardships faced by workers in various trades:

  • The Launderer: Nebmare-nakht describes the launderer’s burden of carrying heavy laundry and scrubbing garments, suggesting that this task is arduous and demeaning.
  • The Potter: Potters, he explains, are constantly covered in clay, their appearance and dignity sullied by their work.
  • The Cobbler: Cobblers are portrayed as mingling with vats of dye, their hands stained with red madder, which Nebmare-nakht compares to being smeared with blood, suggesting an unclean and lowly existence.
  • The Watchman: Watchmen must stay awake all night, battling exhaustion, making their profession equally undesirable.
  • The Merchant and Sailor: Merchants and sailors are described as constantly on the move, traveling up and down the Nile with little respite. Sailors, in particular, leave Egypt with no guarantee of ever returning home, facing the unpredictability of the river and the dangers of long-distance travel.
  • The Carpenter and Timber Cutter: Carpenters must sell their wood to avoid the wrath of shipwrights, and timber cutters face the most grueling task of all, working long hours in the harsh outdoors.

By listing the difficulties faced by people in these trades, Nebmare-nakht aims to make the life of a scribe appear far more desirable. He suggests that while others toil in physically demanding and degrading jobs, the scribe lives in comfort, surrounded by intellectual pursuits.

The Misfortunes of the Peasant

In this section, Nebmare-nakht emphasizes the particular difficulties faced by peasants, who were responsible for farming and maintaining Egypt’s agricultural economy. He describes the peasant’s life as a constant battle against natural forces, such as floods, droughts, and wild animals:

  • The peasant is soaked by rain while working in the fields.
  • After a full day of farming, he spends the night making rope, showing how little rest or relief he gets.
  • If his team of horses is left unattended, jackals may eat them, forcing the peasant to beg for money to replace them.
  • Even when the peasant manages to plant crops, they are vulnerable to pests, theft by Nubian raiders, or simply failing to grow.

If the peasant’s crops fail, he faces severe punishment. Nebmare-nakht describes how a peasant who cannot pay his debts is beaten, tied up, thrown into a well, and ultimately sees his family enslaved. These bleak conditions make the life of a peasant appear deeply perilous and unstable, further reinforcing Nebmare-nakht’s argument that becoming a scribe is the only secure and dignified career path.

The Scribe Does Not Suffer Like the Soldier

In the final section, Nebmare-nakht contrasts the life of a scribe with that of a soldier, another common profession in ancient Egypt. He describes the soldier as the lowest of the low, suffering immensely in the service of the state. Soldiers must wake at odd hours, endure exhausting marches, and survive on minimal food and water. They are constantly exposed to disease, injury, or death, either through combat or the harsh conditions they face. Nebmare-nakht paints a picture of a soldier who is poorly clothed, hungry, and forced to labor as if he were a slave.

While the soldier’s life is filled with hardship and danger, the scribe avoids all these troubles. Nebmare-nakht emphasizes that the scribe’s intellectual work is far superior to the physical toil of a soldier, who risks his life without enjoying the rewards of social prestige or wealth. In contrast, a successful scribe can achieve both material comfort and social standing, living a life of influence and respect.

 

“Let me tell you of the soldier’s hardships and how many superiors he answers to: the general, troop commander, standard-bearer, lieutenant, scribe, and garrison-captain. They demand labor at all hours, treating him like a donkey. Hungry and exhausted, he’s barely alive. Even his grain ration, when received, is unfit for grinding.”

Is the Papyrus Lansing egotistical or propagandistic?

Modern readers may find the text egotistical or propagandistic due to its overt promotion of the scribe’s profession at the expense of all other occupations. The author’s tone is highly biased, presenting the scribe’s life as far superior while dismissing other jobs as unworthy or miserable. This exaggerated self-promotion feels like propaganda, aiming to elevate the status of the scribe in society.

Nebmare-nakht adopts a self-important, egotistical tone, which comes across as humorous to modern readers. His exaggerated praise of the scribe’s profession and disdain for other jobs create a satirical, almost propagandistic style, making the text entertaining as well as informative.

Conclusion

The Papyrus Lansing serves as both an instructional text for aspiring scribes and a broader commentary on the social and occupational hierarchy in ancient Egypt. Through the words of Nebmare-nakht, the document conveys the advantages of a scribal career, portraying it as a path to stability, wealth, and intellectual satisfaction. By highlighting the grueling conditions of other professions—especially those involving manual labor—the text underscores the societal value placed on literacy and administrative skill.

For young scribes like Wenemdiamun, the Papyrus Lansing would have been both a motivational guide and a source of practice, as copying such texts was an essential part of their training. The papyrus also reflects the high regard in which scribes were held in ancient Egyptian society, as their ability to read and write set them apart from the general population. As administrators, record-keepers, and chroniclers, scribes were integral to the functioning of the state and the preservation of Egyptian culture.

Ultimately, the Papyrus Lansing is not only an educational text but also an enduring testament to the importance of literacy and the intellectual life in ancient Egypt. It highlights the advantages of becoming a scribe while also providing modern scholars with insight into the social and economic conditions of the time. Through its rich descriptions of labor, hardship, and the pursuit of knowledge, the papyrus captures the values and aspirations that shaped ancient Egyptian society.

READ MORE: What was daily life like in ancient Egypt?

Questions and Answers about the Papyrus Lansing

What is the Papyrus Lansing, and when does it date to?

The Papyrus Lansing is an ancient Egyptian text written during the reign of Pharaoh Senusret III (1878-1839 BCE). It was composed by the scribe Nebmare-nakht for his apprentice Wenemdiamun.

What is the main purpose of the Papyrus Lansing?

The primary purpose of the Papyrus Lansing is to praise the profession of the scribe, highlighting its superiority over other occupations such as farming, merchant work, and soldiering. It serves as an instructional text encouraging the reader to pursue a career as a scribe.

How does Nebmare-nakht portray other professions in the text?

Nebmare-nakht portrays other professions, such as farming, washing, and soldiering, in a negative light. He describes these jobs as physically exhausting, undesirable, and inferior to the life of a scribe. His depiction emphasizes the hardships and discomforts associated with physical labor.

How does Nebmare-nakht describe the role and benefits of being a scribe?

Nebmare-nakht describes the scribe’s role as noble and prestigious. He claims that scribes enjoy a life of comfort, wearing fine robes, owning property, and having servants. He urges his apprentice to “befriend the scroll and palette,” stating that writing and intellectual work are far more rewarding than any other profession.

How does Nebmare-nakht criticize military life in the papyrus?

Nebmare-nakht criticizes military life by emphasizing the dangers and hardships soldiers face. He argues that although the military may promise wealth or status, soldiers are more likely to die before receiving any rewards. The text describes battle scenes where soldiers meet tragic ends, contrasting this with the safety and comfort of a scribe’s life.

 

“The soldier is summoned for war, denied rest, marching uphill through mountains. He drinks foul, salty water every third day, his body ravaged by illness. Surrounded by enemies, weak and exhausted, he dies far from his family, suffering in both life and death.”

What does Nebmare-nakht’s portrayal of different professions reflect about personal biases in ancient and modern societies?

Nebmare-nakht’s portrayal of different professions reflects the universal tendency to view one’s own career or role with a sense of pride and importance. Just as people in modern times often elevate their jobs or careers while downplaying others, Nebmare-nakht’s biased view serves as a reminder that subjective views on work and social status have existed throughout history.

What lesson can modern readers take away from the Papyrus Lansing?

Modern readers can learn from the Papyrus Lansing that subjective biases about one’s profession are not a new phenomenon. The exaggerated promotion of the scribe’s role reflects a human tendency to elevate one’s own position while looking down on others. This timeless aspect of human nature is still relevant today, offering a connection between the people of the past and present.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *