Antonine Plague
The Antonine Plague is also referred to as the Plague of Galen. It was a deadly epidemic that afflicted the Roman Empire between AD 165 and 180. Named after the Greek physician Galen, who described the symptoms and impact of the disease, the plague is believed to have been introduced into the empire by soldiers returning from campaigns in the Near East. The epidemic was one of the most devastating health crises in antiquity, significantly affecting the Roman population, economy, and military strength.
READ MORE: 10 Worst Pandemics in History
An engraving by Levasseur depicting the Angel of Death striking a door during the Plague of Rome.
Origins and Spread
The outbreak is thought to have originated during the Roman siege of Seleucia in Mesopotamia in the winter of AD 165–166, during the Parthian campaign of Emperor Lucius Verus. Reports indicate that Roman soldiers carried the disease westward, leading to its rapid dissemination across the empire. Ancient historians, including Ammianus Marcellinus and Cassius Dio, documented the disease’s reach to Gaul, the Rhine legions, and eventually Rome itself.
Busts of the co-emperors Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus
By AD 189, a second wave of the epidemic emerged, reportedly causing up to 1,900 deaths per day in the city of Rome alone. Estimates suggest the overall death toll ranged from 5 to 12 million, approximately 10% of the empire’s total population at the time.
Possible Causes and Symptoms of the Antonine Plague
Although the exact nature of the Antonine Plague remains uncertain, historians and medical researchers generally believe that it was caused by smallpox. This theory is based on descriptions of symptoms, which included high fever, diarrhea, pharyngitis, and skin eruptions that appeared red and black in color. Some scholars have suggested measles as an alternative cause, but recent genetic evidence indicates that smallpox became a severe threat in Europe much later.
Galen’s accounts provide crucial, though incomplete, medical insights. He described the disease’s long duration and mentioned pustular skin eruptions that emerged on the ninth day of illness. However, his observations do not definitively confirm whether smallpox or another disease was responsible.
A portrait of Greek physician Galen.
The Antonine Plague was one of the most devastating pandemics of antiquity, significantly impacting the Roman Empire’s population, economy, and military.
Impact of the Antonine Plague on the Roman Empire
The Antonine Plague struck at the height of the Pax Romana, a period of relative peace and prosperity. However, the pandemic caused a severe demographic crisis. Infected cities saw mortality rates rise to 15% or higher, and Rome itself lost a significant portion of its population.
The loss of laborers and skilled workers led to disruptions in agriculture, trade, and public works. The urban centers of the empire, already suffering from high mortality rates due to poor sanitation and overcrowding, became epicenters for the disease’s rapid spread.
Prior to the plague, Rome maintained a robust economy with extensive trade networks extending to the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia. However, the epidemic caused a sharp economic downturn. The labor shortage led to higher wages and inflation, while reduced tax revenues strained government finances. The empire’s economic decline was further exacerbated by declining agricultural yields, which affected food supplies and contributed to social unrest.
The disease’s long-lasting effects, including labor shortages, economic disruption, and military setbacks, contributed to an era of increasing instability.
The Roman army was one of the institutions most severely affected by the epidemic. As the plague swept through military camps, it dramatically reduced the number of available soldiers. This manpower crisis forced Emperor Marcus Aurelius to recruit new soldiers from unconventional sources, including slaves, gladiators, and criminals. The reduced strength of the legions hampered Rome’s ability to defend its borders, particularly against Germanic tribes and Parthian forces.
During the Marcomannic Wars (AD 166–180), Rome struggled to repel invasions along the Danube frontier. The epidemic may have even impacted Rome’s enemies, as Germanic tribes also suffered from the disease. Despite these challenges, Marcus Aurelius managed to achieve some military success, though the instability caused by the plague continued to affect the empire long after his reign.
Major Accomplishments of Marcus Aurelius, the Philosopher-Emperor
Theories on the Plague’s Long-Term Effects
Historians debate the extent to which the Antonine Plague contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire. Some scholars argue that the epidemic marked the beginning of Rome’s gradual downfall, weakening its economic and military foundations.
The view that the plague initiated a period of irreversible decline was supported by 19th-century historian Barthold Georg Niebuhr, who stated that the empire “never recovered from the blow.”
Other historians take a more measured approach, suggesting that while the plague had severe consequences, it did not single-handedly determine the fate of the empire. More recent research argues that Rome displayed resilience, adapting to the crisis and continuing to function effectively despite the challenges posed by the pandemic.
READ MORE: 14 Major Ancient Roman Gods and Goddesses
One hypothesis is that the Antonine Plague led to an increased interest in religion, particularly the cult of Asclepius, the god of medicine. However, there is no substantial epigraphic evidence indicating a surge in devotion to Asclepius during this period.
Some scholars suggest that the epidemic created a climate of uncertainty that may have contributed to the gradual rise of Christianity. The Christian emphasis on charity and care for the sick might have attracted converts, as Christian communities actively provided aid during times of crisis.
Climate and Environmental Factors
Recent research has explored the role of climate change in the outbreak and spread of the Antonine Plague. Studies suggest that pandemics in the Roman Empire, including this one, coincided with periods of cooler and drier climate conditions.
These environmental factors may have weakened immune systems due to food shortages and malnutrition, making populations more vulnerable to disease.
Additionally, climate stress may have driven migration patterns, increasing human interactions that facilitated the spread of infectious diseases.
Frequently Asked Questions
What disease caused the Antonine Plague?
Most scholars believe the disease was smallpox, based on descriptions of symptoms like widespread pustular eruptions. However, some have suggested measles, and no genetic evidence has confirmed its exact nature.
A depiction of a group of physicians including Galen (at the top center)
How did the Antonine Plague spread?
The plague likely originated during the Roman siege of Seleucia (165–166) and spread westward through military and trade routes, reaching nearly all parts of the empire by 172.
What was the death toll of the Antonine Plague?
Estimates suggest 5–12 million people died, approximately 10% of the empire’s population. In Rome alone, up to 2,000 people reportedly died per day during a resurgence in 189.
How did the Antonine Plague impact the Roman economy?
The epidemic disrupted trade, particularly commercial activity in the Indian Ocean, and contributed to economic decline and social instability in the empire.
What effect did the plague have on the Roman army?
The plague devastated the Roman army, forcing Marcus Aurelius to recruit soldiers from unconventional sources like slaves and gladiators, delaying military campaigns against Germanic tribes.
Did the Antonine Plague contribute to the decline of the Roman Empire?
Historians debate its impact; some view it as a turning point that weakened Rome, while others argue it was only one of many challenges the empire faced.
The Antonine Plague wreaked unimaginable level of destruction and havoc between 165 and 180 AD. The plague took the life of many important figures of the time, including Emperor Lucius Verus in in 169 A.D. Image: This transmission electron micrograph depicts a number of smallpox virions
What role did climate play in the spread of the Antonine Plague?
Research suggests the plague coincided with a period of cooler, drier climate, which may have contributed to increased disease susceptibility through food shortages and population stress.
